March 13, 2009

Plagiarism in the news (CrossRef)

A number of articles and news items have brought the issue of plagiarism into focus recently. Last week, a short paper in Science provided an update on the research by Harold Garner and his colleagues that was previously reported in Nature News, and has since been commented on in a number of places including SSP’s Scholarly Kitchen blog.
Garner’s team has taken abstracts from Medline and used a piece of software called eTBLAST to compare them against each other for similar and overlapping text. To date, with a combination of machine and human analysis, they have identified 9120 articles with "high levels of citation similarity and no overlapping authors", and 212 pairs of articles "with signs of potential plagiarism". They have gone on to contact authors and editors and (under assurances of anonymity) have received a range of responses from outrage to apology to denial. As of February 2009 they are aware of their study having triggering 83 internal investigations leading to 46 retractions.
In The Scientist Garner explains that technology has a role to play in plagiarism detection because "You can't expect all the editors and reviewers to have all 18,000,000 papers in their head from biomedicine”. Technology will never be an adequate substitute for a human domain expert’s knowledge and judgment, but a system such as CrossCheck can scan vast amounts of content and flag up potential issues, saving time and adding a level of reassurance previously unavailable.
The CrossCheck database currently contains almost 11 million content items and is on course to become the most comprehensive resource against which to check scholarly content for plagiarism. Look out for sessions on CrossCheck and plagiarism at the UKSG conference at the end of the month, and also at the Council of Science Editors meeting in May.

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Editorial: It is not just the work - It is also the words

    Ramaswamy Murali Indian J Crit Care Med 2007;11:169-72 >>>While one can sympathize with the handicaps in language faced by the Turkish physicists it is important to remember that it is the responsibility of the scientist to meet ethical standards established by the journals or societies in ... READ MORE>>

  • Editorial note: The issue of plagiarism

    Gen Relativ GravitDOI 10.1007/s10714-007-0531-2EDITORIALEditorial note: The issue of plagiarismGeorge F. R. Ellis · Hermann Nicolai© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Readers of this Journal may be aware that the admistrators of the internet archive www.arXiv.org have withdrawn a series of pa... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism: text-matching program offers an answer - Correspondance: NATURE

    John Bechhoefer1The removal of almost 70 papers from the arXiv server on suspicion of plagiarism is dismaying (Nature 449, 8; doi:10.1038/449008b 2007). But, in a similar way to that currently being tested by the cooperative group of publishers CrossRef ('Academic accused of living on borrowed lines... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism? No, we're just borrowing better English - Correspondance: NATURE

    Ihsan Yilmaz1 The accusations made by arXiv that my colleagues and I have plagiarized the works of others, reported in your News story 'Turkish physicists face accusations of plagiarism' (Nature 449, 8; doi:10.1038/449008b 2007) are upsetting and unfair. It's inappropriate to single out my colleague... READ MORE>>

  • Academic Dishonesty and Graduate Students

    CEW Brownbag Discussion • Research on academic dishonesty among graduate students is comparatively limited. Most studies of academic dishonesty in higher education have tended to focus on undergraduates or on students as a whole, without distinguishing between graduate and undergraduate students. As... READ MORE>>

  • A Case of Plagiarism in the Physics Preprint Server arXiv.

    Alex Bienkowski One of the more interesting developments in web-based scientific publishing has been the growth of arXiv, a “preprint” server originally launched by Paul Ginsparg at Los Alamos and now hosted at Cornell. The system was first called xxx, and the domain was high-energy physics. Later... READ MORE>>

  • Nearly there!

    Chris Leonard Plagiarism & PMC Physics A There has been a lot of recent publicity on the Turkish plagiarism sandal which has affected arXiv and several high-profile physics journals recently. This has been an 'elephant in the room' of science publishing for some years now. Skillfully manipulated... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts