May 17, 2011

Online plagiarism hunters track doctoral frauds (DW-WORLD)

The recent revelations of plagiarism by prominent Germans wouldn't be possible without the diligent work of an online community called PlagiPedi. They're working to restore the reputation of German doctoral titles.

The list of targets for a group of online plagiarism hunters is long: over 200 doctoral theses have been flagged by the Internet platform PlagiPedi for a more thorough inspection of their originality. Doctoral theses by famous personalities such as Chancellor Angela Merkel, former Chancellor Helmut Kohl, and Deutsche Bank head Josef Ackermann are among those slated for a closer look. 

Exactly who is behind the online hunt for plagiarists is unknown. Most work with pseudonyms, such as "Dr. Martin Click," who takes care of media requests. Click answers most questions in writing, and does not want to reveal his real name.

He says he's from northern Germany, has a PhD in engineering and is planning a career in research.

"Unfortunately, a person who uncovers these things often gets a reputation for being a whistle-blower in certain fields," says Click. "As long as that's the case, I don't see any reason to put my career as a an academic on the line. A pseudonym offers a certain amount of protection." >>>


No comments:

Random Posts


  • The Dark Alleys of Turkish Academia

    Debora Weber-Wulff I published a short note in September 2012 about the work of a group of academics in Turkey. A. Murat Eren has now organized a translation of their work into English so that a wider group of scientists can take a peek into the very dark alleys of Turkish academia. ht... READ MORE>>

  • Düsseldorf Rescinds Doctorate of Education Minister Schavan - Copy, Shake and Paste

    The dean of the Arts and Humanities faculty of the University of Düsseldorf announced on the evening of February 5, 2013, that the faculty board voted 13:2 that the dissertation of Annette Schavan is a plagiarism. They also voted 12:2:1 to rescind her doctorate.There will be a flurry of press re... READ MORE>>

  • Top Science Scandals of 2012 - The Scientist

    Edyta Zielinska A widely discussed research study published this year showed that more than sloppy mistakes or accidental omissions, retracted papers are most likely to be withdrawn from publication because of scientific misconduct or knowlingly publishing false data. In fact, more than 65 perce... READ MORE>>

  • Elsevier editorial system hacked, reviews faked, 11 retractions follow - Retraction Watch

    For several months now, we’ve been reporting on variations on a theme: Authors submitting fake email addresses for potential peer reviewers, to ensure positive reviews. In August, for example, we broke the story of a Hyung-In Moon, who has now retracted 24 papers published by Informa because he man... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism and Essay Mills

    Dan Ariely Sometimes as I decide what kind of papers to assign to my students, I can’t help but think about their potential to use essay mills. Essay mills are companies whose sole purpose is to generate essays for high school and college students (in exchange for a fee, of course).  S... READ MORE>>

  • Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard - NATURE

    Nature 491,192(08 November 2012) doi:10.1038/491192d Alina Mungiu-Pippidi & Ligia Deca The global market for diplomas and academic rankings has had the unintended consequence of stimulating misconduct, from data manipulation and plagiarism, to sheer fraud. If incentives for integrity prov... READ MORE>>

  • Scientific fraud is rife: it's time to stand up for good science - The Guardian

    The way we fund and publish science encourages fraud. A forum about academic misconduct aims to find practical solutions    Peer review happens behind closed doors, with anonymous reviews only seen by editors and authors. This means we have no idea how effective it is. Photo: Alamy ... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts