December 11, 2012

Elsevier editorial system hacked, reviews faked, 11 retractions follow - Retraction Watch

For several months now, we’ve been reporting on variations on a theme: Authors submitting fake email addresses for potential peer reviewers, to ensure positive reviews. In August, for example, we broke the story of a Hyung-In Moon, who has now retracted 24 papers published by Informa because he managed to do his own peer review.
Now, Retraction Watch has learned that the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) was hacked sometime last month, leading to faked peer reviews and retractions — although the submitting authors don’t seem to have been at fault. As of now, eleven papers by authors in China, India, Iran, and Turkey have been retracted from three journals.
Here’s one of two identical notices that have just run in Optics & Laser Technology, for two unconnected papers: >>>

Random Posts


  • Understanding Publication Ethics

    Geraldine S. Pearson* >>> A recent survey of 524 editors of Wiley-Blackwell science journals (including nursing journals) asked about the severity and frequency of ethical issues, editor confidence in handling these, and awareness of COPE guidelines (Wager, Fiack, Graf, Robinson, &... READ MORE>>

  • Singapore Statement Urges Global Consensus on Research Integrity

    Scientists, scientific journals, and research institutions must adhere to an international set of ethical standards and consider the social implications of their work, says a new statement from 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, co-sponsored by AAAS.The Singapore Statement on Research In... READ MORE>>

  • SINGAPORE STATEMENT on RESEARCH INTEGRITY

    BackgroundThe principles and responsibilities set out in the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity represent the first international effort to encourage the development of unified policies, guidelines and codes of conduct, with the long-range goal of fostering greater integrity in research world... READ MORE>>

  • More retractions from Nobelist - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

    Two prominent journals have retracted papers by Nobel laureate Linda Buck today because she was "unable to reproduce [the] key findings" of experiments done by her former postdoctoral researcher Zhihua Zou, according to a statement made by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC), where Bu... READ MORE>>

  • A Reflection on Plagiarism, Patchwriting, and the Engineering Master's Thesis

    Edward J. Eckel, edward.eckel@wmich.edu How many times has a graduate student asked you questions such as the following: "How many words do I need to change so I'm not plagiarizing?" or "If my professor gives me his article or patent and tells me to go ahead and 'use it', do I need to cite it?... READ MORE>>

  • When is self-plagiarism ok? - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

    When Robert Barbato of the E. Philip Saunders College of Business at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) heard he was being accused of plagiarizing his own work, he was a bit surprised. "I can't plagiarize myself -- those are my own words," he said. And he is not alone in his views. Some scienti... READ MORE>>

  • Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized

    Yuehong Zhang Nature 467 , Page: 153  Date published: (09 September 2010) doi:10.1038/467153d Since October 2008, we have detected unoriginal material in a staggering 31% of papers submitted to the Journal of Zhejiang University–Science (692 of 2,233 submissions). The publication, designate... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts