December 11, 2012

Elsevier editorial system hacked, reviews faked, 11 retractions follow - Retraction Watch

For several months now, we’ve been reporting on variations on a theme: Authors submitting fake email addresses for potential peer reviewers, to ensure positive reviews. In August, for example, we broke the story of a Hyung-In Moon, who has now retracted 24 papers published by Informa because he managed to do his own peer review.
Now, Retraction Watch has learned that the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) was hacked sometime last month, leading to faked peer reviews and retractions — although the submitting authors don’t seem to have been at fault. As of now, eleven papers by authors in China, India, Iran, and Turkey have been retracted from three journals.
Here’s one of two identical notices that have just run in Optics & Laser Technology, for two unconnected papers: >>>

Random Posts


  • Massive Plagiarism Scandal - August 23rd, 2007

    Peter Woit From Ars Mathematica I learned about an article at Ars Technica describing a scandal involving plagiarism of theoretical physics papers by about 20 different people, some of them students at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara. Many of the papers were refereed and published i... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism at arXiv - Ars Mathematica

    A reader tipped me off to this article in Ars Technica about an egregious case of plagiarism uncovered at arXiv. At least two people, grad students at Middle East Technical University (METU), created papers in physics by splicing together existing papers. The plagiarism was uncovered by the faculty ... READ MORE>>

  • 65 admin withdrawals

    65 articles by a group of 14 authors have been withdrawn by the arXiv administration due to excessive reuse of text from articles by other authors. The withdrawn articles were submitted from late 2001 through mid 2007, mainly to gr-qc, and the vast majority (59) were submitted in 2005-2006. (See als... READ MORE>>

  • 38 Admin Withdrawals - arXiv

    38 articles have been withdrawn by the arXiv administration due to plagiarism. READ MORE>>

  • Academic accused of living on borrowed lines

    Nature 448, 632-633 (9 August 2007) | doi:10.1038/448632b; Published online 8 August 2007; Corrected 8 August 2007 There is a Correction (16 August 2007) associated with this document. READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism and falsified data slip into the scientific literature: a report By John Timmer

    The challenges of scientific integrity Scientific progress is conveyed primarily through peer-reviewed publications. These publications are the primary source of information for everyone involved in scientific research, allowing them to understand the current scientific models and consensus and... READ MORE>>

  • Clean House First

    Forrest M. Mims III Based on many years of doing peer-reviewed science while also writing books and columns about science for nonscientists, I have long been persuaded that scientists will have a far better chance of selling their science if they first clean house. Virtually every issue of SCIENC... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts