Dear Colleagues: You may be already aware of a massive case of plagiarism uncovered recently in Turkey. You can find the details by linking to http://arxiv.org/new/removals07aug.html This news will no doubt be as disconcerting to you as it is to me. Plagiarism is not the bane of any one country or culture. Our Centre, because of the diverse backgrounds of its community, must be especially conscious of this blight and eschew it at all costs. With best wishes, K.R. Sreenivasan Abdus Salam Research Professor Director, ICTP
August 31, 2007
Cases of Plagiarism in Turkey
August 23, 2007
2007 Plagiarism Ring Affair - EUREKA
Uncovery
At the beginning of August, Philip Gibbs noted on his blog that his 1998 paper "A White Hole Model of the Big Bang"[6] had been plagiarized in a 2006 preprint, "Relative Energy Associated with a White Hole Model of the Big Bang".[7] Describing himself as "more amused than shocked", Gibbs indicated that the material copied from his paper was merely his description of the Lemaitre-Tolman model, not Gibbs' own original work.[8] (He later explained the motivation and general outline of that work on his blog.[9])
Shortly thereafter, arXiv administrators withdrew a second set of eprints, this time a collection of papers from Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University (COMU) in Çanakkale, Turkey.
Impact
Furthermore, since many of the papers dealt with a rather obscure topic, the Møller version of general relativity, few other physicists would be likely to examine the papers, Ginsparg told Nature.[5]
Others point to the as-yet-unknown extent of the METU-related fraud, and the possibility of other, similar deceptions currently unidentified. In addition, it is difficult to judge whether plagiarizing papers is as harmful as, for example, falsifying data. Since the former generally involves recycling notions which have already gained some degree of scientific acceptance, the primary harm resulting from such plagiarism may be that it furthers the careers of undeserving persons in a scientific community possessing only limited resources.[3]
List of Affected Journals
Peter Woit says, "The situation of the second of these is really confusing, since according to the arXiv it plagiarizes a paper by a completely different group in India, one that the arXiv lists as having "excessive overlap" with an earlier paper by the Turkish plagiarists."[11]
The eprints withdrawn by arXiv are as follows.
-
-
↑ The arXiv entry may be viewed here, as of 2007-08-23; the paper was removed from the arXiv, and after some delay from the Journal of High Energy Physics also.
-
-
↑ 65 admin withdrawals, arXiv. Accessed 2007-10-26.
Note that an earlier version of this arXiv page indicated sixty-seven withdrawn papers by fifteen authors, due to an administrative error on arXiv's part.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Random Posts
Allow me to rephrase, and boost my tally of articles: THE
Rebecca AttwoodScholars are passing off old work as new to drive up publications counts. Pressure to publish is pushing many academics to plagiarise large volumes of their own work by "dressing up" their old research to appear as if it were new, a study has found.Researchers using text-matching s... READ MORE>>
Publish or perish, but at what cost?
J Clin Invest. 2008 July 1; 118(7): 2368. doi: 10.1172/JCI36371. Ushma S. Neill, Executive EditorThe academic scientific enterprise rewards those with the longest CVs and the most publications. Under pressure to generate voluminous output, scientists often fall prey to double publishing, self plagi... READ MORE>>
Repairing research integrity : COMMENTARY: NATURE
A survey suggests that many research misconduct incidents in the United States go unreported to the Office of Research Integrity. Sandra L. Titus, James A. Wells and Lawrence J. Rhoades say it’s time to change that.>>> READ MORE>>
Scientific misconduct: Tip of the iceberg?
Editor's Summary A survey of US researchers suggests that scientific misconduct is greatly under-reported. The Office of Research Integrity was told of only 201 instances of likely misconduct relating to work funded by the Department of Health and Human Services in three years. Yet extrapolation fr... READ MORE>>
EDITORIAL - Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct
Anthony J. (Tony) Smith, Editor J Dent Res 87(3):197, 2008 >>> Most institutions have policies and guidelines for research integrity and misconduct, but I wonder how many of us have read these? The fact that some countries have set up organizations to regulate research integrity perhaps re... READ MORE>>
How Did Honor Evolve?
The biology of integrity By David P. BARASH The Chronicle Review,Volume 54, Issue 37, Page B11 P.S.- David P. Barash is an evolutionary biologist, a professor of psychology at the University of Washington, and a frequent Chronicle contributor. He has never had to turn in any honor-code violators b... READ MORE>>
The Plagiarism Decision Process: The Role of Pressure and Rationalization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 51, NO. 2, Page(s): 152-156, MAY 2008 Richard H. McCuen Abstract — Plagiarism is more than just the failure to use quotation marks or to cite a paraphrased passage. Dual publishing, self-plagiarism, and ghost authorship are other forms of plagiarism. Plagiari... READ MORE>>
Popular Posts
-
This guest post is from Kayhan Kantarlı, a retired professor of physics from the University of Ege in Turkey. He published a first versio...
-
Jeffrey Beall This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. I recommend that scholars not do any business with these pu...
-
The Yomiuri Shimbun Turkish national Serkan Anilir, recently stripped of the doctorate he obtained from the University of Tokyo over plagiar...
-
Richard Knox Many online journals are ready to publish bad research in exchange for a credit card number. That's the conclusion o...
-
When Robert Barbato of the E. Philip Saunders College of Business at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) heard he was being accused of p...