September 27, 2010

SINGAPORE STATEMENT on RESEARCH INTEGRITY

Background
The principles and responsibilities set out in the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity represent the first international effort to encourage the development of unified policies, guidelines and codes of conduct, with the long-range goal of fostering greater integrity in research worldwide.
The Statement is the product of the collective effort and insights of the 340 individuals from 51 countries who participated in the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity. These included researchers, funders, representatives of research institutions (universities and research institutes) and research publishers. The Statement was developed by a small drafting committee (listed below); discussed and commented upon before, during and after the 2nd World Conference; and then finalized for release and global use on 22 September 2010.

Purpose
Publication of the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity is intended to challenge governments, organizations and researchers to develop more comprehensive standards, codes and policies to promote research integrity both locally and on a global basis.
The principles and responsibilities summarized in the Statement provide a foundation for more expansive and specific guidance worldwide. Its publication and dissemination are intended to make it easier for others to provide the leadership needed to promote integrity in research on a global basis, with a common approach to the fundamental elements of responsible research practice.
The Statement is applicable to anyone who does research, to any organization that sponsors research and to any country that uses research results in decision-making. Good research practices are expected of all researchers: government, corporate and academic. To view and download copies of the Statement, click on the links to the right. >>>
_________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer. The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity was developed as part of the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, 21-24 July 2010, in Singapore, as a global guide to the responsible conduct of research. It is not a regulatory document and does not represent the official policies of the countries and organizations that funded and/or participated in the Conference. For official policies, guidance, and regulations relating to research integrity, appropriate national bodies and organizations should be consulted. Posted 22 September 2010;
Statement Drafting Committee:
Nicholas Steneck and Tony Mayer, Co-chairs, 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity
Melissa Anderson, Chair, Organizing Committee, 3rd World Conference on Research Integrity

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Real scientists never report fraud

    Daniel LemireDiederik Stapel has been a psychology professor at major universities for the last ten years. He published well over 100 research papers in prestigious journals such as Science. Some of his research papers have been highly cited. He trained nearly 20 Ph.D. students.It was recently fired... READ MORE>>

  • The Fraud Who Fooled (Almost) Everyone - THE CHRONICLE of HIGHER EDUCATION

    Tom Bartlett  It’s now known that Diederik Stapel, the Dutch social psychologist who was suspended by Tilburg University in September, faked dozens of studies and managed not to get caught for years despite his outrageous fabrications. But how, exactly, did he do it?That question won’t be f... READ MORE>>

  • Diederik Stapel: The Lying Dutchman - The Washington Post

    By Joel AchenbachBig science news today out of the Netherlands: A top social scientist, Diederik Stapel, of Tilburg University, has been suspended after an investigation showed that he’s been fabricating his data for years. This may seem far away and esoteric in the extreme, but there’s collate... READ MORE>>

  • Summation Letter on Plagiarism Case: Psychopathy requires legal entitlement, not logic or shame

    Zahir EbrahimThis is to summarize the situation since my discovery of the masterpiece of plagiarism in a tortuous system of willfully aiding and abetting the theft of intellectual property amidst lip-service to high piety, on Sept. 28, 2011.Over a hundred senior academics and senior civil servants o... READ MORE>>

  • Foreign student rule-breaking: culture clash or survival skills? -TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION

    Jon MarcusNorth American administrators call high rates of plagiarism 'tip of the iceberg'. Jon Marcus reportsGary Pavela remembers being surprised by the defiant reaction of a visiting student from China who he confronted over a clear-cut incident of plagiarism."But in my culture, we view it as hon... READ MORE>>

  • Retracted Science and the Retraction Index

    Ferric C. Fang, Editor in ChiefArturo Casadevall, Editor in ChiefR. P. Morrison, EditorInfection and Immunity Articles may be retracted when their findings are no longer considered trustworthy due to scientific misconduct or error, they plagiarize previously published work, or th... READ MORE>>

  • Science publishing: The trouble with retractions - NATURE

    A surge in withdrawn papers is highlighting weaknesses in the system for handling them.Richard Van NoordenThis week, some 27,000 freshly published research articles will pour into the Web of Science, Thomson Reuters' vast online database of scientific publications. Almost all of these papers will st... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts