March 13, 2009

Plagiarism in the news (CrossRef)

A number of articles and news items have brought the issue of plagiarism into focus recently. Last week, a short paper in Science provided an update on the research by Harold Garner and his colleagues that was previously reported in Nature News, and has since been commented on in a number of places including SSP’s Scholarly Kitchen blog.
Garner’s team has taken abstracts from Medline and used a piece of software called eTBLAST to compare them against each other for similar and overlapping text. To date, with a combination of machine and human analysis, they have identified 9120 articles with "high levels of citation similarity and no overlapping authors", and 212 pairs of articles "with signs of potential plagiarism". They have gone on to contact authors and editors and (under assurances of anonymity) have received a range of responses from outrage to apology to denial. As of February 2009 they are aware of their study having triggering 83 internal investigations leading to 46 retractions.
In The Scientist Garner explains that technology has a role to play in plagiarism detection because "You can't expect all the editors and reviewers to have all 18,000,000 papers in their head from biomedicine”. Technology will never be an adequate substitute for a human domain expert’s knowledge and judgment, but a system such as CrossCheck can scan vast amounts of content and flag up potential issues, saving time and adding a level of reassurance previously unavailable.
The CrossCheck database currently contains almost 11 million content items and is on course to become the most comprehensive resource against which to check scholarly content for plagiarism. Look out for sessions on CrossCheck and plagiarism at the UKSG conference at the end of the month, and also at the Council of Science Editors meeting in May.

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran

    Nature 462, 704-705 (2009) | doi:10.1038/462704a Investigation finds more cases of duplication in publications co-authored by ministers and senior officials.Declan ButlerEXCLUSIVE Nature has uncovered further instances of apparent plagiarism in papers co-authored by governmen... READ MORE>>

  • Analysis of retractions puts spotlight on academia

    Nicola Jones Nature Medicine 15, 1101 (2009) doi:10.1038/nm1009-1101 About half of the medical papers retracted over the past few decades were pulled because of misconduct rather than an innocent mistake, according to two new studies. And that fraction is on the increase. Yet although drug compa... READ MORE>>

  • Peer reviewers satisfied with system : TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION

    David Schley But Sense About Science survey finds that two thirds of those polled think it is failing to detect plagiarism.With the number of learned papers published each year rising to 1.3 million, the peer- review system might be expected to be fraying at the seams. But an international survey ... READ MORE>>

  • Self-plagiarism: unintentional, harmless, or fraud?

    THE LANCETVolume 374, Issue 9691, 29 August 2009-4 September 2009, Page 664 Editorialhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2809%2961536-1 The intense pressure to publish to advance careers and attract grant money, together with decreasing time available for busy researchers and clinicians, can creat... READ MORE>>

  • Retractions up tenfold - TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION

    20 August 2009By Zoë Corbyn 'Publish or perish' factor in withdrawal of science papers. Zoe Corbyn reports var pgtitle = "Retractions up tenfold"; var byline = "Zoë Corbyn"; The rate at which scientific journal articles are being retracted has increased roughly tenfold over the past tw... READ MORE>>

  • Perishing Without Publishing - INSIDE HIGHER ED

    Rob Weir Welcome to the 21st century. Journals and publishing houses are folding faster than a roomful of origami artists, while new online journals are appearing all the time. Nietzsche once proclaimed the demise of God, but the new mantra is “Print is dead!” Maybe, maybe not; but however these ... READ MORE>>

  • The insider’s guide to plagiarism

    EditorialNature Medicine, 707 (2009)Scientific plagiarism—a problem as serious as fraud—has not received all the attention it deserves.Reduced budgets are affecting research just as they are every sector of the economy. So, how can struggling scientists increase their chances of securing their sha... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts