August 30, 2009

Self-plagiarism: unintentional, harmless, or fraud?

THE LANCET
Volume 374, Issue 9691, 29 August 2009-4 September 2009, Page 664
Editorial

The intense pressure to publish to advance careers and attract grant money, together with decreasing time available for busy researchers and clinicians, can create a temptation to cut corners and maximise scientific output. Journals are increasingly seeing submissions in which large parts of text have been copied from previously published papers by the same author.
Whereas plagiarism—copying from others—is widely condemned and regarded as intellectual theft, the concept of self-plagiarism is less well defined. Some have argued that it is impossible to steal one's own words. The excuse editors hear when confronting authors about self-plagiarism is that the same thing can only be said in so many words. This might sometimes be legitimate, perhaps for specific parts of a research paper, such as a methods section. However, when large parts of a paper are a word-for-word copy of previously published text, authors' claims that they have inadvertently used exactly the same wording stretch credibility.
There is a clear distinction between self-plagiarism of original research and review material. Republishing large parts of an original research paper is redundant or duplicate publication. Publishing separate parts of the same study with near identical introduction and methods sections in different journals is so-called salami publication. Both practices are unacceptable and will distort the research record. Self-plagiarism in review or opinion papers, one could argue, is less of a crime with no real harm done. It is still an attempt to deceive editors and readers, however, and constitutes intellectual laziness at best.
Deception is the key issue in all forms of self-plagiarism, including in reviews. Few editors will knowingly republish a paper that contains large parts of previously published material. Few readers will happily read the same material several times in different journals. An attempt to deceive amounts to fraud and should not be tolerated by the academic community.

No comments:

Random Posts


  • German Public Misunderstands Plagiarism - Copy, Shake, and Paste

    "...They really don't get it. So many people think of this as just a little bit of cheating just like everyone does on their taxes and stuff. They do not understand that plagiarism pulls the carpet out from under science." >>> READ MORE>>

  • German defense minister Guttenberg resigns .

    German Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg has announced his resignation after weeks of criticism over plagiarising parts of his Ph.D. thesis."It's the most painful decision of my life," Guttenberg said at a press conference in Berlin.Guttenberg made it clear it wasn't easy to give up the po... READ MORE>>

  • An Open Letter to the Chancellor - Copy, Shake, and Paste

    German scientists and doctoral students are signing an open letter to the German Chancellor by the droves. There are some 7000 signatures as of Feb. 26, 2011. >>> READ MORE>>

  • German minister loses doctorate after plagiarism row

    Germany's defence minister has been stripped of his university doctorate after he was found to have copied large parts of his work from others. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, an aristocrat who lives in a Bavarian castle, admitted breaching standards but denied deliberately cheating. Analysis reveal... READ MORE>>

  • German minister gives up doctorate after plagiarism row

    Germany's defence minister has given up his doctoral title for good, after allegations that he had plagiarised sections of his thesis. Last week Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg said he would temporarily give up the title while his university investigated the charges.The University of Bayreuth says he h... READ MORE>>

  • Misconduct and adventure - TheScientist

    The Lab, a new interactive film from the Office of Research Integrity, is a fresh approach to research misconduct training.The entire film is online at ORI's website. Read more: Misconduct and adventure - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences READ MORE>>

  • Why Cheating is Wrong

    Scott Williams & Michael Courtney Abstract: Mathieu Bouville’s "Why is cheating wrong?" (Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(1), 67-76, 2010) misses the mark by failing to consider the longer term consequences of cheating on student character development and longer term societal consequences... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts