Nicholas A. KotovACS Nano, 2010, 4 (2), pp 585–586DOI: 10.1021/nn100182y >>>> READ MORE>>
Nature 463, 142-143 (2010) , doi:10.1038/463142a Jane Qiu The latest in a string of high-profile academic fraud cases in China underscores the problems of an academic-evaluation system that places disproportionate emphasis on publications, critics say. Editors at the UK-bas... READ MORE>>
THE LANCET, Volume 375, Issue 9709, Page 94, 9 January 2010 EditorialOn Dec 19, 2009, editors at Acta Crystallographica Section Ealerted the scientific community to a disgraceful pattern of fraud involving papers they had published in 2007. At least 70 false crystal structures were reported—mainly... READ MORE>>
Nature 462, 704-705 (2009) | doi:10.1038/462704a Investigation finds more cases of duplication in publications co-authored by ministers and senior officials.Declan ButlerEXCLUSIVE Nature has uncovered further instances of apparent plagiarism in papers co-authored by governmen... READ MORE>>
Nicola Jones Nature Medicine 15, 1101 (2009) doi:10.1038/nm1009-1101 About half of the medical papers retracted over the past few decades were pulled because of misconduct rather than an innocent mistake, according to two new studies. And that fraction is on the increase. Yet although drug compa... READ MORE>>
David Schley But Sense About Science survey finds that two thirds of those polled think it is failing to detect plagiarism.With the number of learned papers published each year rising to 1.3 million, the peer- review system might be expected to be fraying at the seams. But an international survey ... READ MORE>>
THE LANCETVolume 374, Issue 9691, 29 August 2009-4 September 2009, Page 664 Editorialhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2809%2961536-1 The intense pressure to publish to advance careers and attract grant money, together with decreasing time available for busy researchers and clinicians, can creat... READ MORE>>
%20629394953%20Shutterstock.png){kind=avatar}
No comments:
Post a Comment