August 30, 2009

Self-plagiarism: unintentional, harmless, or fraud?

THE LANCET
Volume 374, Issue 9691, 29 August 2009-4 September 2009, Page 664
Editorial

The intense pressure to publish to advance careers and attract grant money, together with decreasing time available for busy researchers and clinicians, can create a temptation to cut corners and maximise scientific output. Journals are increasingly seeing submissions in which large parts of text have been copied from previously published papers by the same author.
Whereas plagiarism—copying from others—is widely condemned and regarded as intellectual theft, the concept of self-plagiarism is less well defined. Some have argued that it is impossible to steal one's own words. The excuse editors hear when confronting authors about self-plagiarism is that the same thing can only be said in so many words. This might sometimes be legitimate, perhaps for specific parts of a research paper, such as a methods section. However, when large parts of a paper are a word-for-word copy of previously published text, authors' claims that they have inadvertently used exactly the same wording stretch credibility.
There is a clear distinction between self-plagiarism of original research and review material. Republishing large parts of an original research paper is redundant or duplicate publication. Publishing separate parts of the same study with near identical introduction and methods sections in different journals is so-called salami publication. Both practices are unacceptable and will distort the research record. Self-plagiarism in review or opinion papers, one could argue, is less of a crime with no real harm done. It is still an attempt to deceive editors and readers, however, and constitutes intellectual laziness at best.
Deception is the key issue in all forms of self-plagiarism, including in reviews. Few editors will knowingly republish a paper that contains large parts of previously published material. Few readers will happily read the same material several times in different journals. An attempt to deceive amounts to fraud and should not be tolerated by the academic community.

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Honest work - NATURE

    Nature 484, 141 (12 April 2012),  doi:10.1038/484141bThe plagiarism police deserve thanks for defending the honour of the PhD.Last week, Hungary's President Pál Schmitt was forced to resign because of plagiarism detected in his 1992 PhD thesis on physical education. Tivadar Tulassay, rector o... READ MORE>>

  • A lot of science is just plain wrong

    Nigel Hawkes Suddenly, everybody’s saying it: the scientific and medical literature is riddled with poor studies, irreproducible results, concealed data and sloppy mistakes.Since these studies underpin a huge number of government policies, from health to the environment, that’s a serious charge.Le... READ MORE>>

  • Hungarian President Resigns in Plagiarism Scandal

    BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — Hungarian President Pal Schmitt resigned Monday because of a plagiarism scandal regarding a doctoral dissertation he had written 20 years ago on the Olympics.>>> READ MORE>>

  • Rector quits after plagiarism scandal

    The rector of Budapest's Semmelweis University has announced his resignation, the latest twist in a plagiarism scandal surrounding President Pal Schmitt.Tivadar Tulassay's announcement followed last week's decision to strip Schmitt of his 1992 doctorate, after an investigative committee set up b... READ MORE>>

  • Hungarian president loses doctorate in plagiarism case

    Semmelweis University has stripped Hungarian President Pál Schmitt of his doctoral degree after determining that he copied much of his thesis from other sources, prompting opposition politicians to call for his resignation, the Hungarian media reported. The university's rector announced the deci... READ MORE>>

  • iThenticate Assesses The Damaging Effects of Research Misconduct

    To: BUSINESS, STATE AND TECHNOLOGY EDITORSNew report examines the distinct costs caused by the rise in plagiarism, falsified research and other scholarly misconductOAKLAND, Calif., March 13, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Turnitin, creators of iThenticate and the leader in plagiarism prevention, to... READ MORE>>

  • How to avoid retractions for plagiarism: Advice from a radiology journal editor (and arXiv) - Retraction Watch

    Earlier this month, we highlighted the concerns of the editors of the ACS Nano journal about self-plagiarism, otherwise known as duplication. The editor of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) — that’s radiology, for the uninitiated — has similar concerns, but about plagiarism of others’ work... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts