March 13, 2012

iThenticate Assesses The Damaging Effects of Research Misconduct

To: BUSINESS, STATE AND TECHNOLOGY EDITORS
New report examines the distinct costs caused by the rise in plagiarism, falsified research and other scholarly misconduct
OAKLAND, Calif., March 13, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Turnitin, creators of iThenticate and the leader in plagiarism prevention, today announced the release of a new report titled, "True Costs of Research Misconduct." The report explores the reasons for the dramatic rise in research misconduct over the past decade and defines four distinct categories of damages caused by research misconduct--individual, brand, capital and human.
To download this free report, visit: http://www.ithenticate.com/research-misconduct-report.
"Research misconduct often creates a ripple effect of costly damages that impacts organizations and the general public--ranging from lawsuits to revoked PhDs to misdiagnosis," said Chris Cross, general manager of iThenticate. "This report calls attention to the importance of establishing preventative measures that will contain a growing and concerning problem."
Due to the growth of the researcher population and a growing pressure to 'publish or perish,' more researchers have taken to cutting corners, resulting in falsified research, fraudulent data, paraphrasing, duplication and blatant plagiarism. Publishers are responding by retracting published research, and implementing more stringent editorial processes and technology solutions.
"If a journal were to be discovered publishing erroneous material, people might think twice about the reputation of that journal," said Benson Honig, a journal editor at Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. "Checking articles through iThenticate prior to submission can protect a journal's reputation and ensure that only top-quality work is being published."
iThenticate helps publishers, researchers and organizations reduce all types of misconduct by comparing manuscripts against the world's largest comparison database--which is comprised of more than 20 billion web pages, and more than 116 million content items, including 30 million published research articles from 283 leading science, technical and medical (STM) publishers. >>>>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Random Posts


  • How Did Honor Evolve?

    The biology of integrity By David P. BARASH The Chronicle Review,Volume 54, Issue 37, Page B11 P.S.- David P. Barash is an evolutionary biologist, a professor of psychology at the University of Washington, and a frequent Chronicle contributor. He has never had to turn in any honor-code violators b... READ MORE>>

  • The Plagiarism Decision Process: The Role of Pressure and Rationalization

    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 51, NO. 2, Page(s): 152-156, MAY 2008 Richard H. McCuen Abstract — Plagiarism is more than just the failure to use quotation marks or to cite a paraphrased passage. Dual publishing, self-plagiarism, and ghost authorship are other forms of plagiarism. Plagiari... READ MORE>>

  • Guest Editorial - Plagiarism

    Kaynak, O.; Braun, R.; Kennedy, I.IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 51, NO. 2, MAY 2008WELCOME to this special issue on plagiarism. One aim of this special issue is to sensitize academics, referees, authors, and editors to the need to watch for plagiarism. The issue contains ten interesting and i... READ MORE>>

  • Editor's note: Recent instances of author misconduct in Pramana

    PRAMANA Vol. 70 (No. 5), page 761, May 2008 Editor's note The exploding nature of the amount of available scientific information indeed makes it a very demanding job for referees and editors to catch possible cases of plagiarism. While many cases are discovered during the refereeing process, some d... READ MORE>>

  • Ethical Policies and Procedures - APS

    Ethical Policies Poster [printer-friendly PDF](Turkish Version and Chinese Version are also available) READ MORE>>

  • Policing international scientific misconduct

    Maxine Clarke In a Commentary in this week’s Nature (452, 686-687; 2008), Christine Boesz and Nigel Lloyd of the OECD propose a practical framework for examining misconduct allegations in multinational scientific teams: it is imperative, they argue, for researchers in cross-boarder collaborations t... READ MORE>>

  • Preventing plagiarism - China Daily

    We should establish an effective checking system to prevent plagiarism of academic papers, says an article in People's Daily. The following is an excerpt:The Internet offers great help for academic research but it is also an easy way to plagiarize someone's work.A company that runs a database for ac... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts