August 6, 2007

Clean House First

Forrest M. Mims III

Based on many years of doing peer-reviewed science while also writing books and columns about science for nonscientists, I have long been persuaded that scientists will have a far better chance of selling their science if they first clean house.

Virtually every issue of SCIENCE and NATURE carries a news story about the latest scandal, plagiarism or paper retraction? When will this end? The miscreants among us drag all of us down in the eyes of the public.

Why do some scientists give support to cynics by exaggerating the facts and making over-the-top predictions to make their point?

Why do some journals and even entire fields of science tolerate overt conflicts of interest while others do not require full disclosure of data and the algorithms used in some models?

Why do many journals charge enormous fees (e.g., $30) for a copy of a paper that was sponsored by taxpayers?

When will every science degree include basic courses in cultural history, the history of science, government, writing, ethics and a general review of all the major fields of science?

It is also worth considering that when some taxpayer-supported scientists disregard or even ridicule the cultural and religious views of the taxpayers who pay their salaries, benefits and overhead, they are not doing science a favor. Yes, they have the right, and it might even make them feel good, but the cost is bad public relations.

Scientists will be far better able to reverse the increasing cynicism among nonscientists when they polish their image by addressing these and other serious issues. I propose that a conference be convened or a panel be designated to review the issues and produce a formal report on how science can address and resolve these issues. The conference or panel should include educators, auditors, former legislators, ethicists, attorneys, citizen scientists, science journalists, journal editors, grad students, post docs, mid-career scientists and senior scientists.

When scientists clean house and are ready to promote their science, there is no better advice than that offered by Richard Feynman in his 1974 commencement address at Caltech: "I would like to add something that's not essential to the science, but something I kind of believe, which is that you should not fool the layman when you're talking as a scientist."

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Cases of Plagiarism in Turkey

    Dear Colleagues: You may be already aware of a massive case of plagiarism uncovered recently in Turkey. You can find the details by linking to http://arxiv.org/new/removals07aug.html This news will no doubt be as disconcerting to you as it is to me. Plagiarism is not the bane of any one country ... READ MORE>>

  • Talk:2007 Plagiarism Ring Affair

    Blake StaceyJust one tiny quibble: "damage control" could suggest that METU is seeking to cover things up or spin them, which seems not to be the case at all, in fact my impression is that METU is handling this much more responsibly than most universities would do. Can I "be bold" in Wikipedia sense... READ MORE>>

  • 2007 Plagiarism Ring Affair - EUREKA

    In August of 2007, the technology-oriented website Ars Technica [1] revealed that the arXiv was withdrawing a set of seventeen physics papers due to plagiarism. These papers had been written by a group of graduate students at the Middle East Technical University (METU) in Ankara, Turkey. After detec... READ MORE>>

  • Massive Plagiarism Scandal - August 23rd, 2007

    Peter Woit From Ars Mathematica I learned about an article at Ars Technica describing a scandal involving plagiarism of theoretical physics papers by about 20 different people, some of them students at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara. Many of the papers were refereed and published i... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism at arXiv - Ars Mathematica

    A reader tipped me off to this article in Ars Technica about an egregious case of plagiarism uncovered at arXiv. At least two people, grad students at Middle East Technical University (METU), created papers in physics by splicing together existing papers. The plagiarism was uncovered by the faculty ... READ MORE>>

  • 65 admin withdrawals

    65 articles by a group of 14 authors have been withdrawn by the arXiv administration due to excessive reuse of text from articles by other authors. The withdrawn articles were submitted from late 2001 through mid 2007, mainly to gr-qc, and the vast majority (59) were submitted in 2005-2006. (See als... READ MORE>>

  • 38 Admin Withdrawals - arXiv

    38 articles have been withdrawn by the arXiv administration due to plagiarism. READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts