August 22, 2007

65 admin withdrawals

65 articles by a group of 14 authors have been withdrawn by the arXiv administration due to excessive reuse of text from articles by other authors. The withdrawn articles were submitted from late 2001 through mid 2007, mainly to gr-qc, and the vast majority (59) were submitted in 2005-2006. (See also this article for additional details.)

The 14 authors, and the number of withdrawn articles co-authored by each, are as follows:

40 M. Salti (Grad Student, METU, Ankara)
29 O. Aydogdu (Grad Student, METU, Ankara)
15 S. Aygun (Grad Student, 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)
14 M. Korunur (Grad Student, Dicle Univ, Diyarbakir)
13 A. Havare (Assoc Prof., Mersin Univ, Icel)
13 I. Tarhan (Assoc. Prof., 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)
10 M. Aygun (Grad Student, 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)
7 H. Baysal (Assoc Prof., 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)
5 I. Acikgoz (Professor, Dicle Univ, Diyarbakir)
4 I. Yilmaz (Professor, Dean, 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)
3 F. Binbay (Assistant Prof., Dicle Univ, Diyarbakir)
3 N. Pirinccioglu (Grad Student, Dicle Univ, Diyarbakir)
3 T. Yetkin (Instructor with PhD, Mersin Univ, Icel)
1 C. Aktas (Grad Student, Math Dept, 18 Mart Univ, Canakkale)

Note 1: The name K. Sogut (Instructor with PhD, Mersin Univ, Icel), who has co-authored with others on the above list, was erroneously included in an earlier version of this list due to an arXiv administrative error. There are no known problems with arXiv.org articles co-authored by K. Sogut.

Note 2: The name T. Yetkin appears only in conjunction with senior co-authors who have a more systematically problematic record.


The 65 withdrawn articles are listed below (the author submissions remain available as earlier versions):

gr-qc/0110023 gr-qc/0207026 gr-qc/0502031 gr-qc/0502032 gr-qc/0502042
gr-qc/0502043 gr-qc/0502058 gr-qc/0502059 gr-qc/0502060 gr-qc/0502061
gr-qc/0505078 gr-qc/0505079 gr-qc/0506061 gr-qc/0506062 gr-qc/0506135
gr-qc/0508018 gr-qc/0509022 gr-qc/0509023 gr-qc/0509047 gr-qc/0509061
gr-qc/0510037 gr-qc/0510038 gr-qc/0510123 gr-qc/0511030 gr-qc/0511095
gr-qc/0512080 gr-qc/0601070 gr-qc/0601133 gr-qc/0601141 gr-qc/0602012
gr-qc/0602070 gr-qc/0603027 gr-qc/0603044 gr-qc/0603063 gr-qc/0603108
gr-qc/0606022 gr-qc/0606028 gr-qc/0606080 gr-qc/0607011 gr-qc/0607082
gr-qc/0607083 gr-qc/0607089 gr-qc/0607095 gr-qc/0607102 gr-qc/0607103
gr-qc/0607104 gr-qc/0607109 gr-qc/0607110 gr-qc/0607115 gr-qc/0607116
gr-qc/0607117 gr-qc/0607119 gr-qc/0607126 gr-qc/0608014 gr-qc/0608024
gr-qc/0608050 gr-qc/0608111 gr-qc/0609101 gr-qc/0611014 gr-qc/0612016
gr-qc/0702047 astro-ph/0505018 0704.0525 0705.2930 0707.1776

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Random Posts


  • What are the consequences of scientific misconduct?

    Yun Xie What happens after a scientist has been found guilty of misconduct such as plagiarism, data manipulation, or fabrication of results? Does a guilty verdict mean permanent exile from the scientific community, or is there room for forgiveness? >>> READ MORE>>

  • Editorial Announcement: Withdrawal of Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 355

    CHIN.PHYS.LETT.Vol. 25, No. 8 (2008) 3094This paper was submitted on 13 October 2006 and appeared in the February issue of 2007 in Chinese Physics Letters. Later it appeared also as arXiv: grqc/0704.0525 in April 2007.As noted recently by the arXiv administrator, this paper plagiarized an earlier ar... READ MORE>>

  • Editorial Announcement: Withdrawal of Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 1821

    CHIN.PHYS.LETT.Vol. 25, No. 8 (2008) 3094This paper was submitted on 1 February 2007 and appeared in the July issue of 2007 in Chinese Physics Letters. Later it appeared also as arXiv:grqc/ 0707.1776 in July 2007.As noted recently by the arXiv administrator, this paper plagiarized an earlier arXiv p... READ MORE>>

  • Detecting Scientific Fraud : The Chronicle Review

    Dan Greenberg Fraud, fakery, or larceny is what ordinary people would call it. But in the sciences’ refined venues the proper term is “misconduct,” and there’s a lot more of it than official figures show, according to a report in Nature (19 June), “Repairing research integrity." >>> READ MORE>>

  • Allow me to rephrase, and boost my tally of articles: THE

    Rebecca AttwoodScholars are passing off old work as new to drive up publications counts. Pressure to publish is pushing many academics to plagiarise large volumes of their own work by "dressing up" their old research to appear as if it were new, a study has found.Researchers using text-matching s... READ MORE>>

  • Publish or perish, but at what cost?

    J Clin Invest. 2008 July 1; 118(7): 2368. doi: 10.1172/JCI36371. Ushma S. Neill, Executive EditorThe academic scientific enterprise rewards those with the longest CVs and the most publications. Under pressure to generate voluminous output, scientists often fall prey to double publishing, self plagi... READ MORE>>

  • Repairing research integrity : COMMENTARY: NATURE

    A survey suggests that many research misconduct incidents in the United States go unreported to the Office of Research Integrity. Sandra L. Titus, James A. Wells and Lawrence J. Rhoades say it’s time to change that.>>> READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts