March 22, 2007

Reply (JHEP Journal)

----- Original Message -----
From: "JHEP Journal"
To: "ODTU Rektor"
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:14 PM
Subject: Ethics Committee

Dear Professor Akbulut,

We have looked to your letter regarding plagiarism.

First of all, in matters of plagiarism it is the injured party that must take action. We are not involved in administering justice.

The authors of the paper in question seem to cite the articles from which they copy sentences or paragraphs. This weakens the case.

It may be that the paper should not have been published and that the refereerred. Unfortunately weak papers get sometimes published.This may happen when the work is in a rather minor subject or not in anactive and competitive field. If the results are oustanding or contradict well known physics this would not happen.

Therefore we fear that we cannot help you in this case.

Sincerely yours,
JHEP Journal

March 21, 2007

Letter to Editors

From: "ODTU Rektor"
To: jhep-eo@jhep.sissa.it
Subject: Ethics Committee
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:22:46 +0200

Dear Editors,

We are writing this message concerning a serious plagiarism case that we have come across with in a paper published by JHEP. First of all, we would like to express our disappointment in finding out that it was completely unnoticed by your Editorial Office and Refereeing Process. The details are provided in the pdf file we attached to this message with the relevant comments inserted in appropriate places.

The authors of this article are two graduate students of our University, Department of Physics, METU, Ankara. They have submitted 46 papers to the physics ArXiv, in 23 months and some of these have already been published by journals similar to yours. These people are going through an investigation led by the Ethics Committee of the University and will, most probaby be expelled from METU. However, it is noteworthy to mention that in their defence, they use the paper mentioned below as 'evidence' that their work is 'of the highest quality since it has been published by one of the leading journals of its area'. Needless to say, JHEP's integrity is in question here and we strongly believe that it is also JHEP's responsibility to react urgently and help us clear out this issue.

We are looking forward to hearing from at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,
Prof.Dr. Ural Akbulut
President

March 1, 2007

Experimenting with plagiarism detection on the arXiv:PHYSICS TODAY

Toni Feder

Starting this summer, submissions to the arXiv, the online server where many physicists check daily for new preprints, will be compared with the server's existing 400 000—and counting—manuscripts to check for plagiarism.
When plagiarism is suspected, the submission will be flagged, and the authors will get a message saying "your article has x% overlap with article 'a.' Do you really want to do this?" says Cornell University physicist Paul Ginsparg, the creator and overseer of the arXiv.>>>

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Random Posts


  • Editorial: It is not just the work - It is also the words

    Ramaswamy Murali Indian J Crit Care Med 2007;11:169-72 >>>While one can sympathize with the handicaps in language faced by the Turkish physicists it is important to remember that it is the responsibility of the scientist to meet ethical standards established by the journals or societies in ... READ MORE>>

  • Editorial note: The issue of plagiarism

    Gen Relativ GravitDOI 10.1007/s10714-007-0531-2EDITORIALEditorial note: The issue of plagiarismGeorge F. R. Ellis · Hermann Nicolai© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Readers of this Journal may be aware that the admistrators of the internet archive www.arXiv.org have withdrawn a series of pa... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism: text-matching program offers an answer - Correspondance: NATURE

    John Bechhoefer1The removal of almost 70 papers from the arXiv server on suspicion of plagiarism is dismaying (Nature 449, 8; doi:10.1038/449008b 2007). But, in a similar way to that currently being tested by the cooperative group of publishers CrossRef ('Academic accused of living on borrowed lines... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism? No, we're just borrowing better English - Correspondance: NATURE

    Ihsan Yilmaz1 The accusations made by arXiv that my colleagues and I have plagiarized the works of others, reported in your News story 'Turkish physicists face accusations of plagiarism' (Nature 449, 8; doi:10.1038/449008b 2007) are upsetting and unfair. It's inappropriate to single out my colleague... READ MORE>>

  • Academic Dishonesty and Graduate Students

    CEW Brownbag Discussion • Research on academic dishonesty among graduate students is comparatively limited. Most studies of academic dishonesty in higher education have tended to focus on undergraduates or on students as a whole, without distinguishing between graduate and undergraduate students. As... READ MORE>>

  • A Case of Plagiarism in the Physics Preprint Server arXiv.

    Alex Bienkowski One of the more interesting developments in web-based scientific publishing has been the growth of arXiv, a “preprint” server originally launched by Paul Ginsparg at Los Alamos and now hosted at Cornell. The system was first called xxx, and the domain was high-energy physics. Later... READ MORE>>

  • Nearly there!

    Chris Leonard Plagiarism & PMC Physics A There has been a lot of recent publicity on the Turkish plagiarism sandal which has affected arXiv and several high-profile physics journals recently. This has been an 'elephant in the room' of science publishing for some years now. Skillfully manipulated... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts