July 19, 2012

Epic fraud: How to succeed in science (without doing any) - ArsTechnica

Running scientific experiments is, frankly, a pain in the ass. Sure, it's incredibly satisfying when days or weeks of hard work produce a clean-looking result that's easy to interpret. But often as not, experiments simply fail for no obvious reason. Even when they work, the results often leave you scratching your head, wondering "what in the world is that supposed to tell me?"
The simplest solution to these problems is obvious: don't do experiments. (Also, don't go out into the field to collect data, which adds the hazards of injury, sunburn, and exotic disease to the mix.) Unfortunately, data has somehow managed to become the foundation of modern science—so you're going to need to get some from somewhere if you want a career. A few brave souls have figured out a way to liberate data from the tyranny of experimentation: they simply make it up.
Dr. Yoshitaka Fujii seems well on his way to becoming the patron saint of scientific fraudsters, setting a record for the most extensive output of fake data. As near as anyone can work out, Fujii started making up data with abandon some time in the 1990s. By 2000, his fellow researchers were already on to him, publishing a comment in which they noted, "We became skeptical when we realized that side effects were almost always identical in all groups."
But you can't let such skepticism from your peers slow you down—and Fujii certainly didn't. Even after the comment was published, two different medical schools hired him as a faculty member. He continued to publish, generally using faked data, racking up an eventual record of 200+ bogus papers. 
Nobody took any responsibility for investigating the prospect of fraud, despite requests made by other researchers who suspected something was amiss. It took until 2011 for the editors of several journals that were victimized by Fujii to band together and hire an outside investigator, who found extensive evidence that the data reported by Fujii was unlikely to have resulted from actual experiments. That finally prompted Toho University, his current employer, to launch its own investigation (PDF). Conclusion: almost none of Fujii's publications were free of falsified data.
Decades of scientific fraud simply shouldn't be this easy. Yet Fujii, along with a few other serial fraudsters, have somehow managed it year after year. In tribute to his staggering success, Ars presents this handy guide on how to get away with faking your data, based on the most popular techniques used in the biggest cases of scientific fraud (so far). Hopefully, it will help answer one of the key questions looming over the Fujii story: In a world of hard data and peer review, just how was such a colossal fraud even possible?

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Copy and paste - NATURE

    Editorial Nature 473, Pages:419–420 , Date published:(26 May 2011)A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one.As retractions go, it may not look like a big deal. Earlier this month, a statistics journal decided to pull a little-cited 2008 paper on the socia... READ MORE>>

  • Is Academic Corruption on the Rise? - INSIDE HIGHER ED

    Ivan Pacheco  In Germany Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, the former Minister of Defense, and Silvana Koch-Mehrin, a Vice-President of the European Parliament, resigned from their positions after plagiarism was discovered in each person’s doctoral dissertation. In the UK, the London School of Econom... READ MORE>>

  • Online plagiarism hunters track doctoral frauds (DW-WORLD)

    The recent revelations of plagiarism by prominent Germans wouldn't be possible without the diligent work of an online community called PlagiPedi. They're working to restore the reputation of German doctoral titles.The list of targets for a group of online plagiarism hunters is long: over 200 doc... READ MORE>>

  • POGO to NIH: Stop Academic Ghostwriting Pollution - AHRP

    Project on Government Oversight (POGO) asked NIH Director to take a firm stance against ghostwriting by academics who receive taxpayer funded grants. POGO reminds the director of the National Institutes of Health (posted below) that taxpayers provide the NIH with $30 billion annually to fund ... READ MORE>>

  • Band of Academic-Plagiarism Sleuths Undoes German Politicians - THE CHRONICLE of HIGHER EDUCATION

    By Aisha LabiThe bad news keeps coming for the disgraced former German defense minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, a once-rising star in his country's conservative party. On Wednesday the University of Bayreuth published the full report of its investigation into plagiarism in his 2006 doctoral diss... READ MORE>>

  • A good day for transparency

    Daniel Mietchen Some brief excerpts from today’s news on matters of plagiarized dissertations in Germany: >>> READ MORE>>

  • Research ethics: science faces On Fact and Fraud (Ars Technica)

    By JOHN TIMMER David Goodstein has a unique perspective on scientific fraud, having pursued a successful career in research physics before becoming the provost of Caltech, one of the world's premier research institutions. As an administrator, he helped formulate Caltech's first policy for scien... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts