September 5, 2011

Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science - The Guardian

David Colquhoun   
Pressure on scientists to publish has led to a situation where any paper, however bad, can now be printed in a journal that claims to be peer-reviewed.
Peer review is the process that decides whether your work gets published in an academic journal. It doesn't work very well any more, mainly as a result of the enormous number of papers that are being published (an estimated 1.3 million papers in 23,750 journals in 2006). There simply aren't enough competent people to do the job. The overwhelming effect of the huge (and unpaid) effort that is put into reviewing papers is to maintain a status hierarchy of journals. Any paper, however bad, can now get published in a journal that claims to be peer-reviewed.
The blame for this sad situation lies with the people who have imposed a publish-or-perish culture, namely research funders and senior people in universities. To have "written" 800 papers is regarded as something to boast about rather than being rather shameful. University PR departments encourage exaggerated claims, and hard-pressed authors go along with them. >>>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Random Posts


  • Japanese Plagiarism and Misrepresentation Case

    Debora Weber-WulffA Japanese correspondent has alerted me to the strange case of Serkan Anilir. He is a German-born researcher of Turkish descent who was said to be an Assistant Professor at the Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo.He has an impressive ... READ MORE>>

  • Articles withdrawn from Open Access Database

    Debora Weber-Wulff I just ran across an article from 2007 about arXiv.org, one of the many Open Access databases, that withdrew 65 papers on General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology by 14 Turkish authors on the basis of the papers containing plagiarized material. One of the authors, a grad student a... READ MORE>>

  • Scientists informally intervene in cases of sloppy research - Ars Technica

    John TimmerMost people involved in scientific research are well aware of the big three ethical lapses: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. These acts are considered to have such a large potential for distorting the scientific record that governments, research institutions, and funding bodies... READ MORE>>

  • Prof Faces Plagiarism Charge

    Shanghai Daily A university professor is at the center of a plagiarism scandal after he was accused of copying from books written by Western researchers in his doctoral dissertation.Zhu Xueqin, a history professor at Shanghai University, denied the online accusation after a newspaper report about t... READ MORE>>

  • Journals step up plagiarism policing

    Nature 466, 167 (2010), doi:10.1038/466167a Cut-and-paste culture tackled by CrossCheck software. Declan Butler Major science publishers are gearing up to fight plagiarism. The publishers, including Elsevier and Springer, are set to roll out software across their journals that will scan submitted pa... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism pinioned

    NATURE/EDITORIAL  doi:10.1038/466159b Published online 07 July 2010 There are tools to detect non-originality in articles, but instilling ethical norms remains essentialIt is both encouraging and disheartening to hear that major science publishers intend to roll out the CrossCheck plagiarism-sc... READ MORE>>

  • Academic corruption undermining higher education: Yau Shing-tung

    By Guo Jiaxue (HK Edition) Updated: 2010-06-02 07:38 In China, the number of published papers in scientific journals are a critical criterion determining a researcher's professional standing and suitability for promotion. Edmond Tang / China Daily Even at China's best universities plagiarism and fa... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts