October 2, 2010

Understanding Publication Ethics

Geraldine S. Pearson* 
>>> A recent survey of 524 editors of Wiley-Blackwell science journals (including nursing journals) asked about the severity and frequency of ethical issues, editor confidence in handling these, and awareness of COPE guidelines (Wager, Fiack, Graf, Robinson, & Rowlands, 2009). Nearly half of the queried editors responded to the survey and, interestingly, most believed that misconduct occurred only rarely in their journals. Are editors too trusting in their belief that submissions will be ethical and free of publication misconduct? Is there denial that this issue actually occurs or “never in my journal”? Is it easier to assume that journal submissions will be free of ethical issues? The answers to these questions are unclear. I can share that at the yearly International Academy of Nursing Editors meetings, the issue of ethics and quality in publications is frequently and passionately discussed by attendees. I also know how painful it is to deal with an ethical issue around a journal submission.>>>

*Pearson, G. S. (2010), Understanding Publication Ethics. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 46: 253–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2010.00276.x

No comments:

Random Posts


  • German minister gives up doctorate after plagiarism row

    Germany's defence minister has given up his doctoral title for good, after allegations that he had plagiarised sections of his thesis. Last week Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg said he would temporarily give up the title while his university investigated the charges.The University of Bayreuth says he h... READ MORE>>

  • Misconduct and adventure - TheScientist

    The Lab, a new interactive film from the Office of Research Integrity, is a fresh approach to research misconduct training.The entire film is online at ORI's website. Read more: Misconduct and adventure - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences READ MORE>>

  • Why Cheating is Wrong

    Scott Williams & Michael Courtney Abstract: Mathieu Bouville’s "Why is cheating wrong?" (Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(1), 67-76, 2010) misses the mark by failing to consider the longer term consequences of cheating on student character development and longer term societal consequences... READ MORE>>

  • Editors Crack Down on Plagiarism With Help of Detective Software

    Adam Marcus Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News  If a plagiarist plagiarizes from an author who has plagiarized, do we call it a wash and go for a beer?That scenario is precisely what Steven L. Shafer, MD, found himself facing recently. Dr. Shafer, editor-in-chief of Anesthesia & An... READ MORE>>

  • Retraction Watch is watching you

    Charles DayBig, scandalous cases of scientific fraud are widely covered in the popular press. In the early 2000s Jan Hendrik Schön of Bell Labs published 21 papers about organic semiconductors: seven in Nature, six in Physical Review Letters, and eight in Science. All of them were withdrawn when it ... READ MORE>>

  • U.S. Scientists Top Research-Fraud List -- How Concerned Should We Be?

    A recent paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics showing that American scientists are responsible for most cases of scientific retractions and fraud is causing a stir.The paper's author, Dr. R. Grant Steen, searched PubMed, a leading science research database, and identified 788 retracted papers from... READ MORE>>

  • Top retractions of 2010 - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

    Jef Akst Retractions are a scientist's worst nightmare. In the last 10 years, at least 788 scientific papers have been pulled from the literature, according to a study published this year in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Whether it is a result of research misconduct, duplicate publication, or simp... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts