September 19, 2010

A Reflection on Plagiarism, Patchwriting, and the Engineering Master's Thesis

Edward J. Eckel, 

How many times has a graduate student asked you questions such as the following: "How many words do I need to change so I'm not plagiarizing?" or "If my professor gives me his article or patent and tells me to go ahead and 'use it', do I need to cite it?" Such questions indicate a profound need for clarification of issues like plagiarism and attributing sources. This need is a result of a disconnect between expectations for graduate students in the sciences and technology, and how they are being educated to meet those expectations. >>>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Random Posts


  • Misconduct and adventure - TheScientist

    The Lab, a new interactive film from the Office of Research Integrity, is a fresh approach to research misconduct training.The entire film is online at ORI's website. Read more: Misconduct and adventure - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences READ MORE>>

  • Why Cheating is Wrong

    Scott Williams & Michael Courtney Abstract: Mathieu Bouville’s "Why is cheating wrong?" (Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(1), 67-76, 2010) misses the mark by failing to consider the longer term consequences of cheating on student character development and longer term societal consequences... READ MORE>>

  • Editors Crack Down on Plagiarism With Help of Detective Software

    Adam Marcus Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News  If a plagiarist plagiarizes from an author who has plagiarized, do we call it a wash and go for a beer?That scenario is precisely what Steven L. Shafer, MD, found himself facing recently. Dr. Shafer, editor-in-chief of Anesthesia & An... READ MORE>>

  • Retraction Watch is watching you

    Charles DayBig, scandalous cases of scientific fraud are widely covered in the popular press. In the early 2000s Jan Hendrik Schön of Bell Labs published 21 papers about organic semiconductors: seven in Nature, six in Physical Review Letters, and eight in Science. All of them were withdrawn when it ... READ MORE>>

  • U.S. Scientists Top Research-Fraud List -- How Concerned Should We Be?

    A recent paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics showing that American scientists are responsible for most cases of scientific retractions and fraud is causing a stir.The paper's author, Dr. R. Grant Steen, searched PubMed, a leading science research database, and identified 788 retracted papers from... READ MORE>>

  • Top retractions of 2010 - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

    Jef Akst Retractions are a scientist's worst nightmare. In the last 10 years, at least 788 scientific papers have been pulled from the literature, according to a study published this year in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Whether it is a result of research misconduct, duplicate publication, or simp... READ MORE>>

  • Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules - SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

    Eugenie Samuel Reich - Nature 468, 745 (2010) Is plagiarism a sin if the duplicated material is one's own? Self-plagiarism may seem a smaller infraction than stealing another author's work, but the practice is under increasing scrutiny, as the eruption two weeks ago of a long-standing controver... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts