April 28, 2010

Tokyo Univ. to crack down on plagiarism in theses

The University of Tokyo will overhaul its thesis examination process and throw the book at anyone found to have plagiarized other people's work, according to the university president.
The tighter screening and tougher penalties come after the university last month effectively dismissed a Turkish assistant professor and revoked his doctorate after finding he had falsified his academic credentials and plagiarized major portions of his doctoral thesis.
The university had never previously revoked a doctorate degree it had conferred.
University President Junichi Hamada told The Yomiuri Shimbun that the university had simplified its screening and background checks of people applying for degrees in recent years.
"This is an unbelievable situation. We'll pinpoint where the problem lies and make the results of our review public," he said.
The university has established an investigation committee and is questioning teachers and officials who screened the researcher's thesis about their examination of his academic record and thesis.
On March 2, the university revoked the doctorate in engineering that had been conferred in March 2003 to Serkan Anilir, an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Engineering.
Anilir, 37, had plagiarized about 40 percent of the data and other parts of his thesis, according to the university.
Anilir also had falsely claimed to have graduated from the Illinois Institute of Technology in the United States and Istanbul Technical University in Turkey.
According to the university, Anilir admitted in February that he had plagiarized theses.
He was given the equivalent of a disciplinary dismissal.
A woman who had been Anilir's manager told The Yomiuri Shimbun that he has returned to Turkey. She declined to comment further.

No comments:

Random Posts


  • Repairing research integrity : COMMENTARY: NATURE

    A survey suggests that many research misconduct incidents in the United States go unreported to the Office of Research Integrity. Sandra L. Titus, James A. Wells and Lawrence J. Rhoades say it’s time to change that.>>> READ MORE>>

  • Scientific misconduct: Tip of the iceberg?

    Editor's Summary A survey of US researchers suggests that scientific misconduct is greatly under-reported. The Office of Research Integrity was told of only 201 instances of likely misconduct relating to work funded by the Department of Health and Human Services in three years. Yet extrapolation fr... READ MORE>>

  • EDITORIAL - Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct

    Anthony J. (Tony) Smith, Editor J Dent Res 87(3):197, 2008 >>> Most institutions have policies and guidelines for research integrity and misconduct, but I wonder how many of us have read these? The fact that some countries have set up organizations to regulate research integrity perhaps re... READ MORE>>

  • How Did Honor Evolve?

    The biology of integrity By David P. BARASH The Chronicle Review,Volume 54, Issue 37, Page B11 P.S.- David P. Barash is an evolutionary biologist, a professor of psychology at the University of Washington, and a frequent Chronicle contributor. He has never had to turn in any honor-code violators b... READ MORE>>

  • The Plagiarism Decision Process: The Role of Pressure and Rationalization

    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 51, NO. 2, Page(s): 152-156, MAY 2008 Richard H. McCuen Abstract — Plagiarism is more than just the failure to use quotation marks or to cite a paraphrased passage. Dual publishing, self-plagiarism, and ghost authorship are other forms of plagiarism. Plagiari... READ MORE>>

  • Guest Editorial - Plagiarism

    Kaynak, O.; Braun, R.; Kennedy, I.IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 51, NO. 2, MAY 2008WELCOME to this special issue on plagiarism. One aim of this special issue is to sensitize academics, referees, authors, and editors to the need to watch for plagiarism. The issue contains ten interesting and i... READ MORE>>

  • Editor's note: Recent instances of author misconduct in Pramana

    PRAMANA Vol. 70 (No. 5), page 761, May 2008 Editor's note The exploding nature of the amount of available scientific information indeed makes it a very demanding job for referees and editors to catch possible cases of plagiarism. While many cases are discovered during the refereeing process, some d... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts