August 5, 2008

Editorial Announcement: Withdrawal of Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 1821

CHIN.PHYS.LETT.
Vol. 25, No. 8 (2008) 3094

This paper was submitted on 1 February 2007 and appeared in the July issue of 2007 in Chinese Physics Letters. Later it appeared also as arXiv:grqc/ 0707.1776 in July 2007.

As noted recently by the arXiv administrator, this paper plagiarized an earlier arXiv paper (grqc/0508005) by I. Radinschi and Th. Grammenos, which also appeared in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006) 4309.

This article by M. Aygun et al. should not have been submitted for publication owing to such substantial replication of an earlier paper. Chinese Physics Letters hereby declares the withdrawal of this paper ‘Moller Energy–Momentum Complex in General Relativity for Higher Dimensional Universes’ by M. Aygun, S. Aygun, I. Yilmaz, H. Baysal, and I. Tarhan published in Chinese Physics Letters, 24 (2007) 1821.

It is unfortunate that this plagiarism was not detected before going to press. I apologize to the readers of Chinese Physics Letters and to Dr I. Radinschi and Dr Th. Grammenos for such an oversight.

Editor: ZHU Bang-Fen

No comments:

Random Posts


  • The Dark Alleys of Turkish Academia

    Debora Weber-Wulff I published a short note in September 2012 about the work of a group of academics in Turkey. A. Murat Eren has now organized a translation of their work into English so that a wider group of scientists can take a peek into the very dark alleys of Turkish academia. ht... READ MORE>>

  • Düsseldorf Rescinds Doctorate of Education Minister Schavan - Copy, Shake and Paste

    The dean of the Arts and Humanities faculty of the University of Düsseldorf announced on the evening of February 5, 2013, that the faculty board voted 13:2 that the dissertation of Annette Schavan is a plagiarism. They also voted 12:2:1 to rescind her doctorate.There will be a flurry of press re... READ MORE>>

  • Top Science Scandals of 2012 - The Scientist

    Edyta Zielinska A widely discussed research study published this year showed that more than sloppy mistakes or accidental omissions, retracted papers are most likely to be withdrawn from publication because of scientific misconduct or knowlingly publishing false data. In fact, more than 65 perce... READ MORE>>

  • Elsevier editorial system hacked, reviews faked, 11 retractions follow - Retraction Watch

    For several months now, we’ve been reporting on variations on a theme: Authors submitting fake email addresses for potential peer reviewers, to ensure positive reviews. In August, for example, we broke the story of a Hyung-In Moon, who has now retracted 24 papers published by Informa because he man... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism and Essay Mills

    Dan Ariely Sometimes as I decide what kind of papers to assign to my students, I can’t help but think about their potential to use essay mills. Essay mills are companies whose sole purpose is to generate essays for high school and college students (in exchange for a fee, of course).  S... READ MORE>>

  • Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard - NATURE

    Nature 491,192(08 November 2012) doi:10.1038/491192d Alina Mungiu-Pippidi & Ligia Deca The global market for diplomas and academic rankings has had the unintended consequence of stimulating misconduct, from data manipulation and plagiarism, to sheer fraud. If incentives for integrity prov... READ MORE>>

  • Scientific fraud is rife: it's time to stand up for good science - The Guardian

    The way we fund and publish science encourages fraud. A forum about academic misconduct aims to find practical solutions    Peer review happens behind closed doors, with anonymous reviews only seen by editors and authors. This means we have no idea how effective it is. Photo: Alamy ... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts