August 12, 2008

What are the consequences of scientific misconduct?

Yun Xie


What happens after a scientist has been found guilty of misconduct such as plagiarism, data manipulation, or fabrication of results? Does a guilty verdict mean permanent exile from the scientific community, or is there room for forgiveness? >>>

August 5, 2008

Editorial Announcement: Withdrawal of Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 355

CHIN.PHYS.LETT.
Vol. 25, No. 8 (2008) 3094

This paper was submitted on 13 October 2006 and appeared in the February issue of 2007 in Chinese Physics Letters. Later it appeared also as arXiv: grqc/0704.0525 in April 2007.

As noted recently by the arXiv administrator, this paper plagiarized an earlier arXiv paper (grqc/0410004) by M. Sharif and T. Fatima, which also appeared in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 4309, and another arXiv paper (gr-qc/0603075) by R. M. Gad.

This article by S. Aygun et al. should not have been submitted for publication owing to such substantial replication of earlier papers. Chinese Physics Letters hereby declares the withdrawal of this paper ‘
On the Energy–Momentum Problem in Static Einstein Universe’ by S. Aygun, I. Tarhan, and H. Baysal published in Chinese Physics Letters 24 (2007) 355

It is unfortunate that this plagiarism was not detected before going to press. I apologize to the readers of Chinese Physics Letters and to Dr M. Sharif, Dr T. Fatima, and Dr R. M. Gad for such an oversight.

Editor: ZHU Bang-Fen

Editorial Announcement: Withdrawal of Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 1821

CHIN.PHYS.LETT.
Vol. 25, No. 8 (2008) 3094

This paper was submitted on 1 February 2007 and appeared in the July issue of 2007 in Chinese Physics Letters. Later it appeared also as arXiv:grqc/ 0707.1776 in July 2007.

As noted recently by the arXiv administrator, this paper plagiarized an earlier arXiv paper (grqc/0508005) by I. Radinschi and Th. Grammenos, which also appeared in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006) 4309.

This article by M. Aygun et al. should not have been submitted for publication owing to such substantial replication of an earlier paper. Chinese Physics Letters hereby declares the withdrawal of this paper ‘Moller Energy–Momentum Complex in General Relativity for Higher Dimensional Universes’ by M. Aygun, S. Aygun, I. Yilmaz, H. Baysal, and I. Tarhan published in Chinese Physics Letters, 24 (2007) 1821.

It is unfortunate that this plagiarism was not detected before going to press. I apologize to the readers of Chinese Physics Letters and to Dr I. Radinschi and Dr Th. Grammenos for such an oversight.

Editor: ZHU Bang-Fen

Random Posts


  • Top Science Scandals of 2012 - The Scientist

    Edyta Zielinska A widely discussed research study published this year showed that more than sloppy mistakes or accidental omissions, retracted papers are most likely to be withdrawn from publication because of scientific misconduct or knowlingly publishing false data. In fact, more than 65 perce... READ MORE>>

  • Elsevier editorial system hacked, reviews faked, 11 retractions follow - Retraction Watch

    For several months now, we’ve been reporting on variations on a theme: Authors submitting fake email addresses for potential peer reviewers, to ensure positive reviews. In August, for example, we broke the story of a Hyung-In Moon, who has now retracted 24 papers published by Informa because he man... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism and Essay Mills

    Dan Ariely Sometimes as I decide what kind of papers to assign to my students, I can’t help but think about their potential to use essay mills. Essay mills are companies whose sole purpose is to generate essays for high school and college students (in exchange for a fee, of course).  S... READ MORE>>

  • Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard - NATURE

    Nature 491,192(08 November 2012) doi:10.1038/491192d Alina Mungiu-Pippidi & Ligia Deca The global market for diplomas and academic rankings has had the unintended consequence of stimulating misconduct, from data manipulation and plagiarism, to sheer fraud. If incentives for integrity prov... READ MORE>>

  • Scientific fraud is rife: it's time to stand up for good science - The Guardian

    The way we fund and publish science encourages fraud. A forum about academic misconduct aims to find practical solutions    Peer review happens behind closed doors, with anonymous reviews only seen by editors and authors. This means we have no idea how effective it is. Photo: Alamy ... READ MORE>>

  • Write My Essay, Please! - The Atlantic

    Richard Gunderman These days, students can hire online companies to do all their coursework, from papers to final exams. Is this ethical, or even legal? A colleague tells the following story. A student in an undergraduate course recently submitted a truly first-rate term paper. In form, it was ... READ MORE>>

  • Study Shows Studies Show Nothing - Money Morning

    Nick Hubble If you’ve ever wondered how a study can show something that just can’t be true, or how studies can completely contradict each other, we’ve figured it out. With a little help of course. After today’s Daily Reckoning, I hope you never believe another ‘study’. Our heartfelt congratulatio... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts