November 12, 2007

ITAP - Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics

ANNOUNCEMENT
The following information is brougth to the attention of international scientific community.
Recently, the plagiarism understood to be committed by some that brought shame to all Turkish physicists have found much echo in the international community.
We, as the Scientific Committee of ITAP condemn these unethical acts that attempt to defame the international credibility of many Turkish institutions, hope that authorities will bring the power of Turkish and international rules to their fullest on the culprits and announce that we are ready to help andcooperate with the implementation of additional preventative measures in this matter. In addition to this, we as ITAP Scientific Committee announce that some individuals, although they have no afiliation nor did any short or long term scientific visits to ITAP, have used ITAP's name as an affilition in their publications.
Currently there is no researcher affiliated by ITAP including the Director and the Scientific Committee members, and all efforts in ITAP are currently carried on the voluntary basis. As far as we know these publications are in the web pages (some are unfortunately already published) http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ChPhL..24..355A
and http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0525 (withdrawn by the archieve)
The relevant administrators of these archieves are to be informed about this notice.
We as ITAP Scientific Committee, will make the necesary legal applications against these misuses of ITAP's name.
ITAP Scientific Committee

November 4, 2007

Editorial: It is not just the work - It is also the words

Ramaswamy Murali
Indian J Crit Care Med 2007;11:169-72
>>>
While one can sympathize with the handicaps in language faced by the Turkish physicists it is important to remember that it is the responsibility of the scientist to meet ethical standards established by the journals or societies in which they intend to publish. Indeed, the example from Turkey highlights a lack of understanding that scientists are also writers and that published language is as proprietary to a scientist as discovery is.>>>

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Random Posts


  • How Many Scientists Fabricate And Falsify Research?(ScienceDaily)

    It's a long-standing and crucial question that, as yet, remains unanswered: just how common is scientific misconduct? In the online, open-access journal PLoS ONE, Daniele Fanelli of the University of Edinburgh reports the first meta-analysis of surveys questioning scientists about their misbehavi... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism Sleuths

    Jennifer Couzin-Frankel & Jackie Grom Science 22 May 2009: Vol. 324. no. 5930, pp. 1004 - 1007 A Texas group is trolling through publications worldwide hunting for signs of duplicated material. The thousands of articles they've flagged online raise questions about standards in publishing—and ab... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism in the news (CrossRef)

    A number of articles and news items have brought the issue of plagiarism into focus recently. Last week, a short paper in Science provided an update on the research by Harold Garner and his colleagues that was previously reported in Nature News, and has since been commented on in a number of places... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts

    EDITORIALJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyK. Höffken and H. GabbertWhen we were young scientists we heard that: ‘‘games authors play’’ and learned that results of scientific work was published by the same authors in different order in different journals. However, the content of the pu... READ MORE>>

  • Plagiarism in Scientific Publications

    Editorial Article Peter R. Mason Biomedical Research & Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe J Infect Developing Countries 2009; 3(1):1-4. >>> READ MORE>>

  • Combating plagiarism

    EditorialNature Photonics 3, 237 (2009)doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.48Accountability of coauthors for scientific misconduct, guest authorship and deliberate or negligent citation plagiarism, highlight the need for accurate author contribution statements.>>> READ MORE>>

  • Responding to Possible Plagiarism

    SCIENCE, 6 March 2009: Vol. 323. no. 5919, pp. 1293 - 1294 DOI: 10.1126/science.1167408Tara C. Long,1 Mounir Errami,2 Angela C. George,1 Zhaohui Sun,2 Harold R. Garner1,2*The peer-review process is the best mechanism to ensure the high quality of scientific publications. However, recent studies have... READ MORE>>

.

.
.

Popular Posts